Thursday, April 7, 2011

Statement from JoAnne Kloppenburg campaign manager Melissa Mulliken

"Wisconsin voters as well as the Kloppenburg for Justice Campaign deserve a full explanation of how and why these 14,000 votes from an entire City were missed. To that end, we will be filing open records requests for all relevant documentation related to the reporting of election results in Waukesha County, as well as to the discovery and reporting of the errors announced by the County. We are confident that election officials in Waukesha County will fulfill these requests as quickly as possible so that both our campaign and the people of Wisconsin can fully understand what happened and why. Just as Assistant Attorney General Kloppenburg has run to restore confidence in the court, Wisconsin residents also deserve to have full confidence in election results."

3 comments:

  1. I'm a math junkie and followed the entire vote as reported on the AP by precinct...

    With JoAnne Kloppenburg still down 835 votes and 24 precincts still to come in, my estimates showed her to take the lead by 366 votes. As it turned out it was 204.

    As for Waukesha County, the numbers do not add up...
    Kathy Nickolaus claims to have omitted 14,315 votes,
    Meaning she did not report 18% of the vote...
    How does one "miss" nearly 20% of votes???

    Beyond that...
    The reports to CNN would indicate that "total votes" omitted were not 14,315 but rather 14,434...
    Where are the other 128 votes???

    To me, it appears addition conjured numbers were presented, after the fact and knowing what would be needed, that would still hold fast the 73% vs. 27% Prosser advantage in the county...

    However, as stated above, under further scrutiny, the numbers do not add up. Nor with a population of roughly 38,922 does a voter turnout of a 37% seem in line.


    In 2007 with a state Supreme Court race, voter turnout was 56%, 44% in 2008...

    With the focus on THIS election... historic... 37%???
    I don't think so...

    Recount the Entire State!!!

    Also...

    In Milwaukee...
    Anyone else notice this???

    philip (4/6/2011 8:25:41 AM): to me the last 10 precincts in Mil looked fishy in Prosser's favor

    philip (4/6/2011 8:27:02 AM): the % stayed the same, but Prosser gained over almost 1500 votes in a precinct he was losing 44% to 56%...
    Hmmmm....

    philip (4/6/2011 8:27:50 AM): 3606 of 3630 precincts in

    philip (4/6/2011 8:28:12 AM): with Prosser up by 835

    philip (4/6/2011 8:28:41 AM): but i still show about 8000 votes still to come in

    Linda (4/6/2011 8:30:47 AM): what would they have done?

    Linda (4/6/2011 8:30:53 AM): cheat somehow?

    philip (4/6/2011 8:31:52 AM): or just made a mistake and put the numbers under the wrong name

    Also curious...

    Milwaukee @ 484/486 of precincts reporting:
    98,933 P
    128,644 K
    227,577 Total votes

    Then:

    Milwaukee 486/486
    98,933 P (43%)
    128,644 (57%)
    227,577 Total votes

    Two additional precincts and NO votes cast???

    “You can take Brookfield, but give us our two missing Milwaukee precincts!!!”

    Just “My Eye On Politics…”

    And yes, I am available for hire…

    ReplyDelete
  2. FYI -
    "Armstrong for Wisconsin"
    in Hopper recall...

    ReplyDelete
  3. http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/whqr/news.newsmain/article/0/0/1790031/National/Republican.judge.nears.Wisconsin.election.win

    Just saw a report by Reuters...
    It looks like Nickolaus et al. has miscalculated and the vote difference is 0.488%. JoAnne Kloppenburg (and the People of Wisconsin) has the right to (and SHOULD) request a state-sponsored recount! Start with Waukesha county, it'll save us time and money. Any vote fraud found should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law to discourage any future Nickolaus et al.'s!

    ReplyDelete

This blog is created to not only keep you informed, but to receive feedback from you as well. Please feel free to comment on any posts. We reserve the right to remove any post we deem inappropriate in language and/or content.